Advertisement
GMS vs GSSC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMS is a Buy and GSSC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GMS (@Building Products) experienced а -2.59% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMS is expected to report earnings on Jun 18, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-0.86% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
GMS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GMS | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PHYS | 26.29 | 0.40 | +1.54% |
| Sprott Physical Gold Trust | |||
| TLTW | 22.68 | -0.09 | -0.40% |
| iShares 20+ Year Trs Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF | |||
| DMAR | 38.92 | -0.20 | -0.51% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Mar | |||
| MAGA | 49.14 | -0.47 | -0.94% |
| Point Bridge America First ETF | |||
| RSHO | 37.72 | -0.71 | -1.85% |
| Tema American Reshoring ETF | |||
GMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been closely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMS | 100% | -2.28% | ||
| BLDR - GMS | 71% Closely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| AWI - GMS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| OC - GMS | 69% Closely correlated | -3.14% | ||
| MAS - GMS | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.05% | ||
| FBIN - GMS | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.82% | ||
More | ||||
GSSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSSC has been closely correlated with UFPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSSC jumps, then UFPI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GSSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSSC | 100% | -2.08% | ||
| UFPI - GSSC | 82% Closely correlated | -1.98% | ||
| BCC - GSSC | 71% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| GMS - GSSC | 67% Closely correlated | -2.28% | ||
| ATKR - GSSC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| SSD - GSSC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
More | ||||