Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMNPX vs MLPDX
GMNPX vs MLPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMNPX vs. MLPDX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMNPX is a Hold and MLPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPDX has more cash in the bank: 4.19B vs. GMNPX (1.67B). MLPDX pays higher dividends than GMNPX: MLPDX (7.09) vs GMNPX (6.41). GMNPX was incepted earlier than MLPDX: GMNPX (8 years) vs MLPDX (16 years). MLPDX (9.02) is less costly to investors than GMNPX (6.62). GMNPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. MLPDX (11.00). GMNPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLPDX: GMNPX (0) vs MLPDX (1000). MLPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.18 vs. GMNPX (1.99). MLPDX (175.56) and GMNPX (172.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GMNPX | MLPDX | GMNPX / MLPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.62 | 9.02 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.62 | 9.02 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.889 | 7.763 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.67B | 4.19B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.41 | 7.09 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.99 | 6.18 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.73 | 62.87 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 172.71 | 175.56 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 245.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement