GMINF
Price
$7.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
RGCCF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

GMINF vs RGCCF

Header iconGMINF vs RGCCF Comparison
Open Charts GMINF vs RGCCFBanner chart's image
G Mining Ventures
Price$7.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$135.78K
CapitalizationN/A
RELEVANT GOLD
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$39.64K
CapitalizationN/A
GMINF vs RGCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMINF vs. RGCCF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMINF is a Sell and RGCCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (GMINF: $7.37 vs. RGCCF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: GMINF and RGCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMINF: 362% vs. RGCCF: 102%
Market capitalization -- GMINF: $422.01M vs. RGCCF: $7.55M
GMINF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $422.01M. RGCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GMINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMINF is a better buy in the long-term than RGCCF.

Price Growth

GMINF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -12.00% price change this week, while RGCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMINF($422M) has a higher market cap than RGCCF($7.55M). GMINF YTD gains are higher at: 72.196 vs. RGCCF (41.723). RGCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.98M vs. GMINF (-6.55M). GMINF has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. RGCCF (766K). GMINF (0) and RGCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GMINFRGCCFGMINF / RGCCF
Capitalization422M7.55M5,593%
EBITDA-6.55M-5.98M109%
Gain YTD72.19641.723173%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash121M766K15,796%
Total Debt15.8MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

GMINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMINF has been loosely correlated with JUPGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMINF jumps, then JUPGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMINF
1D Price
Change %
GMINF100%
+0.63%
JUPGF - GMINF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRCAF - GMINF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGCCF - GMINF
28%
Poorly correlated
+14.33%
BXXRF - GMINF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGRNF - GMINF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More

RGCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGCCF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGCCF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGCCF
1D Price
Change %
RGCCF100%
+14.33%
GMINF - RGCCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
KFFLF - RGCCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCHRF - RGCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDEJF - RGCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
CDNMF - RGCCF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More