Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMF vs MINV
GMF vs MINV Comparison
Open Charts GMF vs MINV
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Price$136.98
Change-$1.20 (-0.87%)
Volume$190
Net Assets396.74M
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Price$36.41
Change-$0.55 (-1.49%)
Volume$500
Net Assets77.91M
GMF vs MINV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMF vs. MINV commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMF is a StrongBuy and MINV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMF has more net assets: 397M vs. MINV (77.9M). MINV has a higher annual dividend yield than GMF: MINV (32.887) vs GMF (20.422). GMF was incepted earlier than MINV: GMF (19 years) vs MINV (3 years). GMF (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than MINV (0.79). MINV has a higher turnover GMF (5.00) vs GMF (5.00).
| GMF | MINV | GMF / MINV | |
| Gain YTD | 20.422 | 32.887 | 62% |
| Net Assets | 397M | 77.9M | 510% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.79 | 62% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 268.33 | 2% |
| Yield | 1.86 | 0.20 | 925% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMF | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
MINV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MINV and DIDIY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MINV and DIDIY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MINV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINV | 100% | -1.50% | ||
| DIDIY - MINV | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PDD - MINV | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| JD - MINV | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.95% | ||
| MMYT - MINV | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
| BILI - MINV | 13% Poorly correlated | -4.59% | ||
More | ||||