Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMF vs MINV
GMF vs MINV Comparison
Open Charts GMF vs MINV
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Price$140.17
Change-$1.11 (-0.79%)
Volume$4.73K
Net Assets391.26M
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Price$35.96
Change-$0.49 (-1.34%)
Volume$4.55K
Net Assets78.15M
GMF vs MINV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMF vs. MINV commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMF is a Hold and MINV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMF has more net assets: 391M vs. MINV (78.1M). MINV has a higher annual dividend yield than GMF: MINV (33.047) vs GMF (23.129). GMF was incepted earlier than MINV: GMF (19 years) vs MINV (3 years). GMF (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than MINV (0.79). MINV has a higher turnover GMF (5.00) vs GMF (5.00).
| GMF | MINV | GMF / MINV | |
| Gain YTD | 23.129 | 33.047 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 391M | 78.1M | 501% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.79 | 62% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 268.33 | 2% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 0.18 | 950% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMF | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 83% | 30 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been closely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
MINV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MINV has been loosely correlated with DIDIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MINV jumps, then DIDIY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MINV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINV | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| DIDIY - MINV | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| LRCX - MINV | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - MINV | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| PDD - MINV | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| ALGM - MINV | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||