Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMET vs URA
GMET vs URA Comparison
Open Charts GMET vs URA
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$34.52
Change+$0.91 (+2.71%)
Volume$1.97K
Net Assets25.84M
Global X Uranium ETF
Price$46.61
Change+$1.35 (+2.98%)
Volume$15.86K
Net Assets5.11B
GMET vs URA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMET vs. URA commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMET is a StrongBuy and URA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
URA has more net assets: 5.11B vs. GMET (25.8M). URA has a higher annual dividend yield than GMET: URA (68.783) vs GMET (61.210). GMET was incepted earlier than URA: GMET (4 years) vs URA (15 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than URA (0.69). GMET (20.00) and URA (19.18) have matching turnover.
| GMET | URA | GMET / URA | |
| Gain YTD | 61.210 | 68.783 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 25.8M | 5.11B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.69 | 88% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 19.18 | 104% |
| Yield | 1.17 | 1.64 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMET | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 22% Poorly correlated | -8.72% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||
URA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, URA has been closely correlated with SMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if URA jumps, then SMR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y