Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMET vs LIT
GMET vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts GMET vs LIT
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$43.41
Change-$2.05 (-4.51%)
Volume$600
Net Assets36.35M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$70.25
Change-$1.70 (-2.36%)
Volume$356
Net Assets1.67B
GMET vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMET vs. LIT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMET is a Buy and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.67B vs. GMET (36.3M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: GMET (22.732) vs LIT (10.931). GMET was incepted earlier than LIT: GMET (4 years) vs LIT (16 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| GMET | LIT | GMET / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 22.732 | 10.931 | 208% |
| Net Assets | 36.3M | 1.67B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.75 | 81% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 51.63 | 39% |
| Yield | 1.57 | 0.44 | 355% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMET | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SGML have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SGML's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +5.55% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 22% Poorly correlated | +11.35% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +5.38% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.46% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | +8.58% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 71% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +11.35% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.75% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||