Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMET vs LIT
GMET vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts GMET vs LIT
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$32.54
Change-$0.25 (-0.76%)
Volume$634
Net Assets24.47M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$63.69
Change+$1.38 (+2.21%)
Volume$601.46K
Net Assets1.42B
GMET vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMET vs. LIT commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMET is a Hold and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.42B vs. GMET (24.5M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: GMET (57.412) vs LIT (53.338). GMET was incepted earlier than LIT: GMET (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| GMET | LIT | GMET / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 57.412 | 53.338 | 108% |
| Net Assets | 24.5M | 1.42B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.75 | 81% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 22.87 | 87% |
| Yield | 1.22 | 0.43 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMET | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 19% Poorly correlated | +6.20% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
More | ||||