Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMET vs LIT
GMET vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts GMET vs LIT
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$37.97
Change+$0.62 (+1.66%)
Volume$78.64K
Net Assets30.05M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$67.89
Change+$0.79 (+1.18%)
Volume$260.42K
Net Assets1.53B
GMET vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMET vs. LIT commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMET is a Hold and LIT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.53B vs. GMET (30M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: GMET (82.297) vs LIT (67.069). GMET was incepted earlier than LIT: GMET (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| GMET | LIT | GMET / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 82.297 | 67.069 | 123% |
| Net Assets | 30M | 1.53B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.75 | 81% |
| Turnover | 20.00 | 22.87 | 87% |
| Yield | 1.17 | 0.42 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMET | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +1.67% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.50% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 22% Poorly correlated | +7.33% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +1.18% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +7.33% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||