Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMET vs LAC
GMET vs LAC Comparison
Open Charts GMET vs LAC
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$37.97
Change+$0.62 (+1.66%)
Volume$78.64K
Net Assets30.05M
Lithium Americas
Price$4.69
Change-$0.17 (-3.50%)
Volume$7.93M
Capitalization1.47B
GMET vs LAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMET vs. LAC commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMET is a Hold and LAC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAC: Fundamental Ratings
LAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMET | LAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +1.67% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.50% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 22% Poorly correlated | +7.33% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.77% | ||
More | ||||
LAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAC has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LAC jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | 100% | -3.50% | ||
| LAR - LAC | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| SLI - LAC | 52% Loosely correlated | -5.80% | ||
| PMETF - LAC | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.01% | ||
| SGML - LAC | 42% Loosely correlated | +7.33% | ||
| GLNCY - LAC | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
More | ||||