Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs TRCLX
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$27.49
Change+$0.39 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.06M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.42
Change+$0.44 (+3.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.38M
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 60.4M vs. GMEPX (39.1M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: TRCLX (1.39) vs GMEPX (1.25). GMEPX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GMEPX (7 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GMEPX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GMEPX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). GMEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.76 vs. TRCLX (41.88). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.20 vs. GMEPX (-21.99).
| GMEPX | TRCLX | GMEPX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.915 | 27.083 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.1M | 60.4M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 1.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.76 | 41.88 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.62 | 16.50 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.99 | -0.20 | 10,960% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers