Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs TRCLX
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs TRCLX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$27.99
Change+$0.22 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.7M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.23
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
GMEPX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMEPX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMEPX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 62.5M vs. GMEPX (40.7M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: TRCLX (1.36) vs GMEPX (1.20). GMEPX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: GMEPX (8 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than GMEPX (1.93). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: GMEPX (0) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.99 vs. GMEPX (30.13). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -6.14 vs. GMEPX (-27.89).
| GMEPX | TRCLX | GMEPX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.03 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.278 | 34.754 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.7M | 62.5M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.36 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.13 | 33.99 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.08 | 25.47 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.89 | -6.14 | 454% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement