Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEPX vs MCDFX
GMEPX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts GMEPX vs MCDFX
Goldman Sachs China Equity P
Price$28.64
Change+$0.16 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.63M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
GMEPX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMEPX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMEPX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. GMEPX (41.6M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than GMEPX: MCDFX (2.84) vs GMEPX (1.19). GMEPX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: GMEPX (8 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). GMEPX (1.93) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. GMEPX (70.00). GMEPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: GMEPX (0) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.91 vs. GMEPX (32.49). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.29 vs. GMEPX (-28.95).
| GMEPX | MCDFX | GMEPX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.32 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.32 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.594 | 34.849 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 99.3M | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 2.84 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.49 | 35.91 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.99 | 36.33 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.95 | -2.29 | 1,262% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 43.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement