It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMED’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMED’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
GMED (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -1.09% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.
GMED is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
GMED | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GMED | MDEV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago51% | 1 day ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago66% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago70% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TSLR | 21.68 | 1.43 | +7.06% |
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | |||
UPAR | 14.66 | 0.31 | +2.14% |
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF | |||
BTZ | 11.07 | 0.11 | +1.00% |
BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust | |||
MAKX | 50.37 | 0.38 | +0.76% |
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF | |||
LFAK | 132.61 | N/A | N/A |
LifeX 2052 Longevity Income ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMED has been loosely correlated with VREX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMED jumps, then VREX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMED | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GMED | 100% | +0.51% | ||
VREX - GMED | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
CVRX - GMED | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
CTKB - GMED | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
ITGR - GMED | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
BRKR - GMED | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.49% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDEV has been loosely correlated with GEHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDEV jumps, then GEHC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MDEV | 100% | +1.30% | ||
GEHC - MDEV | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
VLTO - MDEV | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
SN - MDEV | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.33% | ||
GMED - MDEV | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
ALGN - MDEV | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.28% | ||
More |