It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GME’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHD’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GME’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GME (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +14.55% price change this week, while HD (@Specialty Stores) price change was +5.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.21%.
GME is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.
HD is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
GME | HD | GME / HD | |
Capitalization | 3.83B | 380B | 1% |
EBITDA | 26.5M | 25.1B | 0% |
Gain YTD | 50.941 | 20.628 | 247% |
P/E Ratio | 599.50 | 24.36 | 2,461% |
Revenue | 5.27B | 153B | 3% |
Total Cash | 1.2B | 3.76B | 32% |
Total Debt | 603M | 52.2B | 1% |
GME | HD | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HD's Valuation (89) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as GME (95) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that HD’s stock grew similarly to GME’s over the last 12 months.
HD's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GME (67) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that HD’s stock grew somewhat faster than GME’s over the last 12 months.
HD's SMR Rating (6) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for GME (89) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that HD’s stock grew significantly faster than GME’s over the last 12 months.
GME's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as HD (45) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that GME’s stock grew similarly to HD’s over the last 12 months.
HD's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is significantly better than the same rating for GME (99) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that HD’s stock grew significantly faster than GME’s over the last 12 months.
GME | HD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago51% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago51% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% | 4 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago66% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago37% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GME and CRMT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GME and CRMT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GME | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GME | 100% | -1.42% | ||
CRMT - GME | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.43% | ||
BARK - GME | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
LESL - GME | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
HD - GME | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.76% | ||
LOW - GME | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HD has been closely correlated with LOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HD jumps, then LOW could also see price increases.