Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMO International Equity IV
Price$33.33
Change-$0.40 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets981.46M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.55
Change-$0.17 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.84B
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMCFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMCFX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. GMCFX (981M). GMCFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: GMCFX (2.78) vs TRIGX (1.90). GMCFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: GMCFX (28 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GMCFX (0.67). GMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMCFX: TRIGX (2500) vs GMCFX (125000000). GMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.93 vs. TRIGX (38.57). GMCFX (98.30) and TRIGX (98.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GMCFX | TRIGX | GMCFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.87 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.405 | 39.612 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 125000000 | 2500 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 981M | 16.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 1.90 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.93 | 38.57 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 91.21 | 84.72 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.30 | 98.02 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.17 | 113.16 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers