Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMO International Equity IV
Price$30.55
Change-$0.04 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMCFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMCFX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMCFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: GMCFX (3.32) vs TRIGX (2.04). GMCFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: GMCFX (28 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GMCFX (0.66). GMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMCFX: TRIGX (2500) vs GMCFX (250000000). GMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.19 vs. TRIGX (25.12). GMCFX (102.05) and TRIGX (99.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GMCFX | TRIGX | GMCFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.87 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.87 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.235 | 26.780 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000000 | 2500 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 15.8B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.32 | 2.04 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.19 | 25.12 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.37 | 72.07 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.05 | 99.95 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.01 | 78.90 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement