Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMO International Equity IV
Price$32.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets944.21M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.35B
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMCFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMCFX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. GMCFX (944M). GMCFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: GMCFX (2.82) vs TRIGX (1.91). GMCFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: GMCFX (28 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GMCFX (0.67). GMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMCFX: TRIGX (2500) vs GMCFX (125000000). GMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.40 vs. TRIGX (27.26). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. GMCFX (103.35).
| GMCFX | TRIGX | GMCFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.87 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.302 | 34.432 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 125000000 | 2500 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 944M | 16.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 1.91 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.40 | 27.26 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.54 | 99.99 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.35 | 108.71 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.94 | 100.18 | 134% |