Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMO International Equity IV
Price$36.49
Change+$4.11 (+12.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$25.75
Change+$2.94 (+12.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMCFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMCFX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. GMCFX (1.12B). GMCFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: GMCFX (5.34) vs TRIGX (2.47). GMCFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: GMCFX (28 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than GMCFX (0.67). GMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMCFX: TRIGX (2500) vs GMCFX (125000000). TRIGX (50.40) and GMCFX (49.92) have marching annual gain over last year. GMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 108.08 vs. TRIGX (101.32).
| GMCFX | TRIGX | GMCFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.81 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.087 | 8.284 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 125000000 | 2500 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 17.1B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.34 | 2.47 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.92 | 50.40 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.71 | 85.64 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.08 | 101.32 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 215.06 | 163.24 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement