GM
Price
$81.28
Change
+$0.05 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:34 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
75.78B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBGAF
Price
$70.91
Change
+$1.37 (+1.97%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
67.1B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GM vs MBGAF

Header iconGM vs MBGAF Comparison
Open Charts GM vs MBGAFBanner chart's image
General Motors
Price$81.28
Change+$0.05 (+0.06%)
Volume$7.1K
Capitalization75.78B
Mercedes Benz Group AG
Price$70.91
Change+$1.37 (+1.97%)
Volume$11.02K
Capitalization67.1B
GM vs MBGAF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GM vs. MBGAF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GM is a Hold and MBGAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (GM: $81.23 vs. MBGAF: $70.91)
Brand notoriety: GM: Notable vs. MBGAF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GM: 85% vs. MBGAF: 68%
Market capitalization -- GM: $75.78B vs. MBGAF: $67.1B
GM [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $75.78B. MBGAF’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $67.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.46T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $40.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBGAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBGAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GM and MBGAF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBGAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MBGAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBGAF is a better buy in the short-term than GM.

Price Growth

GM (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -0.83% price change this week, while MBGAF (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +6.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

GM is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

MBGAF is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+6.05% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GM($75.8B) has a higher market cap than MBGAF($67.1B). GM has higher P/E ratio than MBGAF: GM (15.50) vs MBGAF (9.40). MBGAF YTD gains are higher at: 0.756 vs. GM (-0.111). GM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.9B vs. MBGAF (15.6B). MBGAF has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. GM (11.9B). MBGAF has less debt than GM: MBGAF (84.4B) vs GM (133B). GM has higher revenues than MBGAF: GM (187B) vs MBGAF (137B).
GMMBGAFGM / MBGAF
Capitalization75.8B67.1B113%
EBITDA18.9B15.6B121%
Gain YTD-0.1110.756-15%
P/E Ratio15.509.40165%
Revenue187B137B136%
Total Cash11.9B26.1B46%
Total Debt133B84.4B158%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GM vs MBGAF: Fundamental Ratings
GM
MBGAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7964
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4378
SMR RATING
1..100
7979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4885

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBGAF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GM (86) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that MBGAF’s stock grew significantly faster than GM’s over the last 12 months.

GM's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBGAF (78) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

GM's SMR Rating (79) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MBGAF (79) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

GM's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBGAF (49) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

GM's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as MBGAF (12) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to MBGAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMMBGAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBGAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TTMI96.523.28
+3.52%
TTM Technologies
BSVN43.140.74
+1.75%
Bank7 Corp
MIRA1.480.02
+1.37%
MIRA Pharmaceuticals
ODD33.80-0.01
-0.03%
ODDITY Tech Ltd
CCCXU20.14-1.07
-5.02%
Churchill Capital Corp

GM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GM has been loosely correlated with F. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GM jumps, then F could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GM
1D Price
Change %
GM100%
-2.41%
F - GM
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
STLA - GM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
TM - GM
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
MBGYY - GM
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
MBGAF - GM
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
More

MBGAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBGAF has been closely correlated with MBGYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBGAF jumps, then MBGYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBGAF
1D Price
Change %
MBGAF100%
+1.97%
MBGYY - MBGAF
96%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
VWAPY - MBGAF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
VWAGY - MBGAF
71%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
POAHY - MBGAF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
STLA - MBGAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
More