It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while SNPTF (@Electronic Components) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.62%.
GLW is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
GLW | SNPTF | GLW / SNPTF | |
Capitalization | 40.3B | 7.47B | 539% |
EBITDA | 2.04B | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 58.108 | -25.057 | -232% |
P/E Ratio | 247.63 | 29.67 | 835% |
Revenue | 12.6B | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 1.61B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 8.34B | N/A | - |
GLW | SNPTF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 34 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SNPTF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GLW (63) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SNPTF’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.
GLW's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNPTF (100) in the null industry. This means that GLW’s stock grew significantly faster than SNPTF’s over the last 12 months.
SNPTF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (88) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that SNPTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.
GLW's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPTF (51) in the null industry. This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPTF’s over the last 12 months.
GLW's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNPTF (82) in the null industry. This means that GLW’s stock grew significantly faster than SNPTF’s over the last 12 months.
GLW | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago62% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GLW | 100% | -0.34% | ||
TEL - GLW | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
LFUS - GLW | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
SANM - GLW | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
CTS - GLW | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
TTMI - GLW | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.28% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPTF and SOTGY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPTF and SOTGY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNPTF | 100% | N/A | ||
SOTGY - SNPTF | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
GLW - SNPTF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
MRAAY - SNPTF | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
OMRNF - SNPTF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TRUHF - SNPTF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |