GLW
Price
$79.13
Change
-$0.78 (-0.98%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
67.78B
32 days until earnings call
SANM
Price
$113.14
Change
-$0.03 (-0.03%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.03B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLW vs SANM

Header iconGLW vs SANM Comparison
Open Charts GLW vs SANMBanner chart's image
Corning
Price$79.13
Change-$0.78 (-0.98%)
Volume$8.52M
Capitalization67.78B
Sanmina
Price$113.14
Change-$0.03 (-0.03%)
Volume$535.21K
Capitalization6.03B
GLW vs SANM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLW vs. SANM commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLW is a Buy and SANM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GLW: $79.13 vs. SANM: $113.14)
Brand notoriety: GLW: Notable vs. SANM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLW: 114% vs. SANM: 68%
Market capitalization -- GLW: $67.78B vs. SANM: $6.03B
GLW [@Electronic Components] is valued at $67.78B. SANM’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $6.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $149.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSANM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SANM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLW is a better buy in the long-term than SANM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SANM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SANM is a better buy in the short-term than GLW.

Price Growth

GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while SANM (@Electronic Components) price change was -5.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLW is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

SANM is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.29% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLW($67.8B) has a higher market cap than SANM($6.03B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than SANM: GLW (84.18) vs SANM (24.23). GLW YTD gains are higher at: 69.161 vs. SANM (49.531). GLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.83B vs. SANM (494M). GLW has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. SANM (798M). SANM has less debt than GLW: SANM (305M) vs GLW (8.5B). GLW has higher revenues than SANM: GLW (14.2B) vs SANM (8.05B).
GLWSANMGLW / SANM
Capitalization67.8B6.03B1,125%
EBITDA2.83B494M573%
Gain YTD69.16149.531140%
P/E Ratio84.1824.23347%
Revenue14.2B8.05B176%
Total Cash1.49B798M187%
Total Debt8.5B305M2,787%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLW vs SANM: Fundamental Ratings
GLW
SANM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2756
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
7865
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5118
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
503

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLW's Valuation (22) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SANM (64). This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (8). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's SMR Rating (65) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (78). This means that SANM’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SANM (41). This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SANM’s over the last 12 months.

SANM's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (51). This means that SANM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLWSANM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWMFX66.22N/A
N/A
American Funds Washington Mutual 529F1
GMCUX16.96N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity R6
NMIAX30.01N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
GGCIX136.45N/A
N/A
Gabelli Growth I
FIKNX20.30N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Z

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
-0.94%
FLEX - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
APH - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
CLS - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
SANM - GLW
66%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
TEL - GLW
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More

SANM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SANM has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SANM jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANM
1D Price
Change %
SANM100%
-0.02%
BHE - SANM
71%
Closely correlated
-3.03%
FLEX - SANM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
PLXS - SANM
68%
Closely correlated
-1.93%
GLW - SANM
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
CLS - SANM
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More