GLUC
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
647.71K
HLNFF
Price
$13.24
Change
-$0.08 (-0.60%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
300.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLUC vs HLNFF

Header iconGLUC vs HLNFF Comparison
Open Charts GLUC vs HLNFFBanner chart's image
Glucose Health
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$10.2K
Capitalization647.71K
High Liner Foods
Price$13.24
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
Volume$500
Capitalization300.75M
GLUC vs HLNFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLUC vs. HLNFF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLUC is a Hold and HLNFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GLUC: $0.08 vs. HLNFF: $13.24)
Brand notoriety: GLUC and HLNFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLUC: 173% vs. HLNFF: 20%
Market capitalization -- GLUC: $647.71K vs. HLNFF: $300.75M
GLUC [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $647.71K. HLNFF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $300.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLUC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLUC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLNFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNFF is a better buy in the long-term than GLUC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLUC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLUC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HLNFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLNFF is a better buy in the short-term than GLUC.

Price Growth

GLUC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -10.30% price change this week, while HLNFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLNFF($301M) has a higher market cap than GLUC($648K). HLNFF YTD gains are higher at: 18.993 vs. GLUC (-32.500). HLNFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 85.2M vs. GLUC (-32.45K). HLNFF has more cash in the bank: 10.5M vs. GLUC (29.3K). GLUC has less debt than HLNFF: GLUC (431K) vs HLNFF (254M). HLNFF has higher revenues than GLUC: HLNFF (1.08B) vs GLUC (88.1K).
GLUCHLNFFGLUC / HLNFF
Capitalization648K301M0%
EBITDA-32.45K85.2M-0%
Gain YTD-32.50018.993-171%
P/E RatioN/A10.30-
Revenue88.1K1.08B0%
Total Cash29.3K10.5M0%
Total Debt431K254M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLUC vs HLNFF: Fundamental Ratings
GLUC
HLNFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10021
SMR RATING
1..100
10055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLNFF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLUC (61). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

HLNFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLUC (100). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

HLNFF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLUC (100). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

HLNFF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (65). This means that HLNFF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GLUC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLNFF (83). This means that GLUC’s stock grew significantly faster than HLNFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLUCHLNFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBSTX51.150.35
+0.69%
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Tr
NWAPX35.270.07
+0.20%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc Egl
MSFRX19.580.02
+0.10%
MFS Total Return A
DHSCX22.75N/A
N/A
Diamond Hill Small Cap Inv
ARDGX27.38N/A
N/A
Archer Dividend Growth

GLUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLUC and GUZOF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLUC and GUZOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLUC
1D Price
Change %
GLUC100%
-10.30%
GUZOF - GLUC
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GLUC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - GLUC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCHOY - GLUC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNFF - GLUC
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLNFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLNFF and GPAGF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLNFF and GPAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNFF
1D Price
Change %
HLNFF100%
N/A
GPAGF - HLNFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYAF - HLNFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - HLNFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - HLNFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GUZOF - HLNFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More