GLUC
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.64M
GRBMF
Price
$3.07
Change
+$0.07 (+2.33%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLUC vs GRBMF

Header iconGLUC vs GRBMF Comparison
Open Charts GLUC vs GRBMFBanner chart's image
Glucose Health
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.32K
Capitalization1.64M
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V
Price$3.07
Change+$0.07 (+2.33%)
Volume$200
Capitalization13.72B
GLUC vs GRBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLUC vs. GRBMF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLUC is a Buy and GRBMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GLUC: $0.09 vs. GRBMF: $3.07)
Brand notoriety: GLUC and GRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLUC: 112% vs. GRBMF: 10%
Market capitalization -- GLUC: $1.64M vs. GRBMF: $13.72B
GLUC [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $1.64M. GRBMF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $13.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $238.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLUC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLUC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GRBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GLUC and GRBMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLUC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRBMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLUC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRBMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRBMF is a better buy in the short-term than GLUC.

Price Growth

GLUC (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.41% price change this week, while GRBMF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.73% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRBMF($13.7B) has a higher market cap than GLUC($1.64M). GRBMF YTD gains are higher at: 18.464 vs. GLUC (-21.583). GRBMF has more cash in the bank: 8.12B vs. GLUC (46.2K). GLUC has less debt than GRBMF: GLUC (431K) vs GRBMF (193B).
GLUCGRBMFGLUC / GRBMF
Capitalization1.64M13.7B0%
EBITDAN/A58.1B-
Gain YTD-21.58318.464-117%
P/E RatioN/A21.29-
RevenueN/A427B-
Total Cash46.2K8.12B0%
Total Debt431K193B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLUC vs GRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
GLUC
GRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1935
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
10070
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
460
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GRBMF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (55). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (100). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (100). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GRBMF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (64). This means that GRBMF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GLUC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GRBMF (60). This means that GLUC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLUCGRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DXR10.630.21
+2.02%
Daxor Corp
ARDX6.510.11
+1.72%
Ardelyx
ONBPO25.05-0.01
-0.04%
Old National Bancorp
ADC71.89-0.31
-0.43%
Agree Realty Corp
SNWV38.81-0.94
-2.36%
Sanuwave Health Inc

GLUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLUC and GUZOF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLUC and GUZOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLUC
1D Price
Change %
GLUC100%
N/A
GUZOF - GLUC
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GLUC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - GLUC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNFF - GLUC
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
GLAPF - GLUC
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
More

GRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRBMF and BMBOY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRBMF and BMBOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRBMF
1D Price
Change %
GRBMF100%
N/A
BMBOY - GRBMF
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.42%
FTLF - GRBMF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.82%
GPAGF - GRBMF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLUC - GRBMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - GRBMF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
More