Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs SMAPX
GLPIX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. SMAPX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. SMAPX (1.31B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: GLPIX (6.61) vs SMAPX (3.88). GLPIX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: GLPIX (13 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMAPX (52.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMAPX: GLPIX (0) vs SMAPX (1000). SMAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. GLPIX (1.79). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 170.82 vs. SMAPX (131.95).
| GLPIX | SMAPX | GLPIX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.37 | 492% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.40 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.866 | 8.269 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 1.31B | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 3.88 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | 7.33 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.00 | 69.16 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 170.82 | 131.95 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.23 | 204.67 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement