Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs SMAPX
GLPIX vs SMAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. SMAPX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and SMAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. SMAPX (1.24B). GLPIX pays higher dividends than SMAPX: GLPIX (7.03) vs SMAPX (4.18). GLPIX was incepted earlier than SMAPX: GLPIX (13 years) vs SMAPX (13 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than SMAPX (1.40). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. SMAPX (74.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMAPX: GLPIX (0) vs SMAPX (1000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. SMAPX (-0.72). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 151.22 vs. SMAPX (111.41).
| GLPIX | SMAPX | GLPIX / SMAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.37 | 492% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.40 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.012 | 1.442 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 1.24B | 131% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.03 | 4.18 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.42 | -0.72 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.28 | 56.64 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.22 | 111.41 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.17 | 199.24 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement