Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPZX
GLPIX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPZX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. PRPZX (504M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPZX (10.95) vs GLPIX (6.61). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). GLPIX (0) and PRPZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. PRPZX (1.24). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 170.82 vs. PRPZX (134.36).
| GLPIX | PRPZX | GLPIX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.866 | 7.679 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 504M | 327% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 10.95 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | 1.24 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.00 | 54.87 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 170.82 | 134.36 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.23 | 162.49 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement