Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPZX
GLPIX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPZX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Buy and PRPZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. PRPZX (504M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPZX (49.29) vs GLPIX (6.60). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: GLPIX (12 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). GLPIX (0) and PRPZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.63 vs. GLPIX (11.32). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 203.18 vs. PRPZX (168.35).
| GLPIX | PRPZX | GLPIX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.695 | 3.310 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 504M | 324% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.60 | 49.29 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 16.63 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.11 | 58.11 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.18 | 168.35 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.49 | 50.65 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement