Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPZX
GLPIX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPZX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. PRPZX (463M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPZX (11.68) vs GLPIX (7.03). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). GLPIX (0) and PRPZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. PRPZX (-5.61). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 151.22 vs. PRPZX (110.47).
| GLPIX | PRPZX | GLPIX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.012 | 1.002 | 301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 463M | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.03 | 11.68 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.42 | -5.61 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.28 | 44.45 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.22 | 110.47 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.17 | 152.04 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement