Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPZX
GLPIX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPZX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Buy and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. PRPZX (468M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPZX (57.40) vs GLPIX (6.99). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPZX (70.00). GLPIX (0) and PRPZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.84 vs. PRPZX (-0.90). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 172.50 vs. PRPZX (133.70).
| GLPIX | PRPZX | GLPIX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.18 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.538 | -0.262 | -970% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 468M | 339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.99 | 57.40 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.84 | -0.90 | -205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.39 | 48.00 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 172.50 | 133.70 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.59 | 112.51 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement