Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPCX
GLPIX vs PRPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. PRPCX (494M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPCX (13.37) vs GLPIX (6.61). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPCX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPCX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPCX (2.20). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPCX (70.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPCX: GLPIX (0) vs PRPCX (1000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. PRPCX (-1.55). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 170.82 vs. PRPCX (116.51).
| GLPIX | PRPCX | GLPIX / PRPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 2.20 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 2.20 | 306% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.866 | 7.522 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 494M | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 13.37 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | -1.55 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.00 | 46.79 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 170.82 | 116.51 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.23 | 129.91 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement