Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPAX
GLPIX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.61B vs. PRPAX (484M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPAX (61.26) vs GLPIX (6.99). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPAX: GLPIX (0) vs PRPAX (1000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.06 vs. PRPAX (-5.52). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 173.53 vs. PRPAX (126.22).
| GLPIX | PRPAX | GLPIX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.46 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.51 | 446% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.318 | -0.456 | -728% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 484M | 332% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.99 | 61.26 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.06 | -5.52 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.72 | 39.69 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 173.53 | 126.22 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.47 | 112.98 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement