Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPAX
GLPIX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. PRPAX (463M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPAX (12.25) vs GLPIX (7.03). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPAX: GLPIX (0) vs PRPAX (1000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. PRPAX (-6.32). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 151.22 vs. PRPAX (106.30).
| GLPIX | PRPAX | GLPIX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.46 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.51 | 446% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.012 | 1.077 | 280% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 463M | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.03 | 12.25 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.42 | -6.32 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.28 | 42.62 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 151.22 | 106.30 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.17 | 143.59 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers