Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPIX vs PRPAX
GLPIX vs PRPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPIX vs. PRPAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPIX is a Hold and PRPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPIX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. PRPAX (504M). PRPAX pays higher dividends than GLPIX: PRPAX (11.47) vs GLPIX (6.61). GLPIX was incepted earlier than PRPAX: GLPIX (13 years) vs PRPAX (12 years). GLPIX (6.74) is less costly to investors than PRPAX (1.51). GLPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. PRPAX (70.00). GLPIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPAX: GLPIX (0) vs PRPAX (1000). GLPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.79 vs. PRPAX (0.47). GLPIX return over 5 years is better than : 170.82 vs. PRPAX (129.42).
| GLPIX | PRPAX | GLPIX / PRPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.46 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.51 | 446% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.866 | 7.720 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 504M | 327% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 11.47 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.79 | 0.47 | 378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.00 | 52.66 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 170.82 | 129.42 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.23 | 153.13 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement