GLPEF
Price
$18.15
Change
-$1.55 (-7.87%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.56B
TGS
Price
$21.33
Change
-$5.11 (-19.33%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.98B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLPEF vs TGS

Header iconGLPEF vs TGS Comparison
Open Charts GLPEF vs TGSBanner chart's image
Galp Energia, SA
Price$18.15
Change-$1.55 (-7.87%)
Volume$201
Capitalization13.56B
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA
Price$21.33
Change-$5.11 (-19.33%)
Volume$600
Capitalization3.98B
GLPEF vs TGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLPEF vs. TGS commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPEF is a Hold and TGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GLPEF: $18.15 vs. TGS: $26.44)
Brand notoriety: GLPEF and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLPEF: 32% vs. TGS: 136%
Market capitalization -- GLPEF: $13.56B vs. TGS: $3.98B
GLPEF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $13.56B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $3.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $465.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $55.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLPEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLPEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the long-term than TGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLPEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLPEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the short-term than TGS.

Price Growth

GLPEF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -6.06% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

TGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-2.16% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPEF($13.6B) has a higher market cap than TGS($3.98B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than GLPEF: TGS (17.36) vs GLPEF (11.11). GLPEF YTD gains are higher at: 4.333 vs. TGS (-6.418). TGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 674B vs. GLPEF (3.1B). TGS has more cash in the bank: 676B vs. GLPEF (2.77B). GLPEF has less debt than TGS: GLPEF (4.95B) vs TGS (674B). TGS has higher revenues than GLPEF: TGS (1.21T) vs GLPEF (20.3B).
GLPEFTGSGLPEF / TGS
Capitalization13.6B3.98B342%
EBITDA3.1B674B0%
Gain YTD4.333-6.418-68%
P/E Ratio11.1117.3664%
Revenue20.3B1.21T2%
Total Cash2.77B676B0%
Total Debt4.95B674B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLPEF vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
GLPEF
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5323
SMR RATING
1..100
4251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4190
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLPEF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as TGS (53) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as GLPEF (53) in the null industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TGS (51) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as TGS (58) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (90) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLPEFTGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAYGX37.010.22
+0.60%
Oakmark Global Advisor
MAVKX15.010.03
+0.20%
MoA Small Cap Value Fund
HCPCX50.20N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS IC
CZMGX20.27-0.02
-0.10%
Multi-Manager Growth Strategies Inst
PRWCX37.77-0.14
-0.37%
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation

GLPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLPEF and TGS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLPEF and TGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLPEF
1D Price
Change %
GLPEF100%
-7.85%
TGS - GLPEF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
EQNR - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
NFG - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
E - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
BPAQF - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
More

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
-0.41%
YPF - TGS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
PBR - TGS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
SHEL - TGS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
EC - TGS
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
CVE - TGS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.22%
More