GLPEF
Price
$19.51
Change
+$0.94 (+5.06%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.43B
NFG
Price
$93.72
Change
+$1.16 (+1.25%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.47B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLPEF vs NFG

Header iconGLPEF vs NFG Comparison
Open Charts GLPEF vs NFGBanner chart's image
Galp Energia, SA
Price$19.51
Change+$0.94 (+5.06%)
Volume$399
Capitalization14.43B
National Fuel Gas
Price$93.72
Change+$1.16 (+1.25%)
Volume$516.57K
Capitalization8.47B
GLPEF vs NFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLPEF vs. NFG commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPEF is a Buy and NFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GLPEF: $19.51 vs. NFG: $93.72)
Brand notoriety: GLPEF and NFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLPEF: 41% vs. NFG: 90%
Market capitalization -- GLPEF: $14.43B vs. NFG: $8.47B
GLPEF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $14.43B. NFG’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $8.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $499.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $57.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLPEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLPEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the long-term than NFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLPEF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLPEF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the short-term than NFG.

Price Growth

GLPEF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while NFG (@Integrated Oil) price change was +8.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

NFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.68% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPEF($14.4B) has a higher market cap than NFG($8.47B). NFG has higher P/E ratio than GLPEF: NFG (34.71) vs GLPEF (11.86). NFG YTD gains are higher at: 56.451 vs. GLPEF (12.141). GLPEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.1B vs. NFG (918M). GLPEF has more cash in the bank: 2.77B vs. NFG (39.3M). NFG has less debt than GLPEF: NFG (2.74B) vs GLPEF (4.95B). GLPEF has higher revenues than NFG: GLPEF (20.3B) vs NFG (2.18B).
GLPEFNFGGLPEF / NFG
Capitalization14.4B8.47B170%
EBITDA3.1B918M338%
Gain YTD12.14156.45122%
P/E Ratio11.8634.7134%
Revenue20.3B2.18B930%
Total Cash2.77B39.3M7,046%
Total Debt4.95B2.74B180%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLPEF vs NFG: Fundamental Ratings
GLPEF
NFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5032
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4718
SMR RATING
1..100
4277
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
189
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5014

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLPEF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFG (74) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as GLPEF (47) in the null industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFG (77) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that GLPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as GLPEF (49) in the null industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as GLPEF (18) in the null industry. This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLPEFNFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKE18.750.69
+3.82%
Skeena Resources Limited
TZUP5.340.18
+3.49%
Thumzup Media Corporation
BAOS3.300.04
+1.23%
Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited
LAMR121.631.03
+0.85%
Lamar Advertising Company
FFWM5.74-0.06
-1.03%
First Foundation

GLPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLPEF and TGS have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLPEF and TGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLPEF
1D Price
Change %
GLPEF100%
+5.10%
TGS - GLPEF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%
EQNR - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NFG - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
E - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
BPAQF - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.88%
More

NFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFG has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFG jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFG
1D Price
Change %
NFG100%
+1.25%
SHEL - NFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
E - NFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
CVX - NFG
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
XOM - NFG
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
SU - NFG
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More