Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPAX vs MLPZX
GLPAX vs MLPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. MLPZX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a Hold and MLPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPZX has more cash in the bank: 3.93B vs. GLPAX (1.64B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than MLPZX: GLPAX (7.14) vs MLPZX (6.65). GLPAX was incepted earlier than MLPZX: GLPAX (12 years) vs MLPZX (15 years). MLPZX (8.77) is less costly to investors than GLPAX (6.99). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. MLPZX (11.00). GLPAX (1000) and MLPZX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.38 vs. GLPAX (10.91). MLPZX return over 5 years is better than : 251.49 vs. GLPAX (215.55).
| GLPAX | MLPZX | GLPAX / MLPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 8.77 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 8.77 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.372 | 4.992 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 3.93B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.14 | 6.65 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | 12.38 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.44 | 65.99 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 215.55 | 251.49 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.76 | 101.43 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement