Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPAX vs MLPZX
GLPAX vs MLPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. MLPZX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a Hold and MLPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPZX has more cash in the bank: 3.93B vs. GLPAX (1.64B). GLPAX (6.87) and MLPZX (6.58) have matching dividends . GLPAX was incepted earlier than MLPZX: GLPAX (12 years) vs MLPZX (15 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than MLPZX (6.31). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. MLPZX (11.00). GLPAX (1000) and MLPZX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.63 vs. GLPAX (11.73). MLPZX return over 5 years is better than : 216.58 vs. GLPAX (181.27).
| GLPAX | MLPZX | GLPAX / MLPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 6.31 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 6.31 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.800 | 5.033 | 56% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 3.93B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.87 | 6.58 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.73 | 13.63 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.02 | 64.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.27 | 216.58 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.35 | 95.44 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement