Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPAX vs MLPDX
GLPAX vs MLPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. MLPDX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a StrongBuy and MLPDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPDX has more cash in the bank: 3.88B vs. GLPAX (1.58B). MLPDX (7.64) and GLPAX (7.38) have matching dividends . GLPAX was incepted earlier than MLPDX: GLPAX (13 years) vs MLPDX (16 years). MLPDX (9.02) is less costly to investors than GLPAX (6.99). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. MLPDX (11.00). GLPAX (6%) and MLPDX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. GLPAX (1000) and MLPDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.59 vs. GLPAX (4.26). MLPDX return over 5 years is better than : 224.85 vs. GLPAX (195.63).
| GLPAX | MLPDX | GLPAX / MLPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 9.02 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 9.02 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.262 | 5.228 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 3.88B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.38 | 7.64 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | 8.59 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.09 | 56.02 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.63 | 224.85 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.86 | 126.42 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement