Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLPAX vs MLPDX
GLPAX vs MLPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLPAX vs. MLPDX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLPAX is a Hold and MLPDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPDX has more cash in the bank: 3.93B vs. GLPAX (1.64B). MLPDX (7.16) and GLPAX (6.87) have matching dividends . GLPAX was incepted earlier than MLPDX: GLPAX (12 years) vs MLPDX (15 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than MLPDX (6.56). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. MLPDX (11.00). GLPAX (6%) and MLPDX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. GLPAX (1000) and MLPDX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MLPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.29 vs. GLPAX (11.73). MLPDX return over 5 years is better than : 212.84 vs. GLPAX (181.27).
| GLPAX | MLPDX | GLPAX / MLPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 6.56 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.99 | 6.56 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.800 | 4.948 | 57% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 3.93B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.87 | 7.16 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.73 | 13.29 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.02 | 63.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 181.27 | 212.84 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.35 | 90.74 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement