Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLOV vs MOTO
GLOV vs MOTO Comparison
Open Charts GLOV vs MOTO
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
Price$58.19
Change+$0.18 (+0.31%)
Volume$36.42K
Net Assets1.52B
Guinness Atkinson Smart Trans & Tch ETF
Price$53.40
Change+$0.39 (+0.74%)
Volume$365
Net Assets8.08M
GLOV vs MOTO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLOV vs. MOTO commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLOV is a Buy and MOTO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLOV has more net assets: 1.52B vs. MOTO (8.08M). MOTO has a higher annual dividend yield than GLOV: MOTO (26.486) vs GLOV (19.428). GLOV was incepted earlier than MOTO: GLOV (4 years) vs MOTO (6 years). GLOV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than MOTO (0.68). GLOV has a higher turnover MOTO (7.68) vs MOTO (7.68).
| GLOV | MOTO | GLOV / MOTO | |
| Gain YTD | 19.428 | 26.486 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 8.08M | 18,811% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.68 | 37% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 7.68 | 286% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 0.85 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GLOV | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GLOV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLOV has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLOV jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOV | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| MCO - GLOV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| BN - GLOV | 75% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| LIN - GLOV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MFC - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| MA - GLOV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||
MOTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOTO has been loosely correlated with CON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOTO jumps, then CON could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOTO | 100% | N/A | ||
| CON - MOTO | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| DAN - MOTO | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
| TSLA - MOTO | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| POWI - MOTO | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| NXPI - MOTO | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||