Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLOV vs MOTG
GLOV vs MOTG Comparison
Open Charts GLOV vs MOTG
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
Price$57.05
Change-$0.35 (-0.61%)
Volume$37.59K
Net Assets1.52B
VanEck Morningstar Glb Wd Mt ETF
Price$44.83
Change-$0.69 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.2M
GLOV vs MOTG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLOV vs. MOTG commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLOV is a Buy and MOTG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLOV has more net assets: 1.52B vs. MOTG (18.2M). MOTG has a higher annual dividend yield than GLOV: MOTG (25.593) vs GLOV (17.786). GLOV was incepted earlier than MOTG: GLOV (4 years) vs MOTG (7 years). GLOV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than MOTG (0.52). MOTG has a higher turnover GLOV (25.00) vs GLOV (25.00).
| GLOV | MOTG | GLOV / MOTG | |
| Gain YTD | 17.786 | 25.593 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 18.2M | 8,335% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.52 | 48% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 78.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 1.76 | 4.48 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GLOV | MOTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GLOV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLOV has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLOV jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOV | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| MCO - GLOV | 77% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BN - GLOV | 75% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| LIN - GLOV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| MFC - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| MA - GLOV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
MOTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOTG has been loosely correlated with GEHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MOTG jumps, then GEHC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOTG | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| GEHC - MOTG | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| RTO - MOTG | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| AM - MOTG | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BAER - MOTG | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| MO - MOTG | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.62% | ||
More | ||||