Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLOV vs HEAT
GLOV vs HEAT Comparison
Open Charts GLOV vs HEAT
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
Price$58.19
Change+$0.18 (+0.31%)
Volume$36.42K
Net Assets1.52B
Touchstone Climate Transition ETF
Price$30.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$136
Net Assets13.81M
GLOV vs HEAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLOV vs. HEAT commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLOV is a Buy and HEAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLOV has more net assets: 1.52B vs. HEAT (13.8M). HEAT (19.924) and GLOV (19.428) have matching annual dividend yield . GLOV was incepted earlier than HEAT: GLOV (4 years) vs HEAT (3 years). GLOV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than HEAT (0.69). HEAT has a higher turnover GLOV (22.00) vs GLOV (22.00).
| GLOV | HEAT | GLOV / HEAT | |
| Gain YTD | 19.428 | 19.924 | 98% |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 13.8M | 11,007% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.69 | 36% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 65.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 0.53 | 324% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GLOV | HEAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | 12 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GLOV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLOV has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLOV jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOV | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| MCO - GLOV | 77% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| BN - GLOV | 75% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| LIN - GLOV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MFC - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| MA - GLOV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||
HEAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HEAT and WPM have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HEAT and WPM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| WPM - HEAT | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| UBER - HEAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| RSG - HEAT | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| NVT - HEAT | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APTV - HEAT | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||