Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLOV vs HEAT
GLOV vs HEAT Comparison
Open Charts GLOV vs HEAT
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
Price$57.05
Change-$0.35 (-0.61%)
Volume$827
Net Assets1.51B
Touchstone Climate Transition ETF
Price$31.07
Change-$0.08 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.01M
GLOV vs HEAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLOV vs. HEAT commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLOV is a Buy and HEAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLOV has more net assets: 1.51B vs. HEAT (14M). HEAT has a higher annual dividend yield than GLOV: HEAT (20.195) vs GLOV (17.786). GLOV was incepted earlier than HEAT: GLOV (4 years) vs HEAT (3 years). GLOV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than HEAT (0.69). HEAT has a higher turnover GLOV (25.00) vs GLOV (25.00).
| GLOV | HEAT | GLOV / HEAT | |
| Gain YTD | 17.786 | 20.195 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 14M | 10,807% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.69 | 36% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 65.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 1.76 | 0.52 | 340% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GLOV | HEAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GLOV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLOV has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLOV jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOV | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| MCO - GLOV | 77% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| BN - GLOV | 75% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| LIN - GLOV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| MFC - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| MA - GLOV | 72% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
More | ||||
HEAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HEAT and UBER have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HEAT and UBER's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HEAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| UBER - HEAT | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.03% | ||
| WPM - HEAT | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.54% | ||
| RSG - HEAT | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| NVT - HEAT | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
| ARRY - HEAT | 6% Poorly correlated | -8.69% | ||
More | ||||