GLNS
Price
$1.05
Change
+$0.30 (+40.00%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.42M
GMVMF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
19.53M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLNS vs GMVMF

Header iconGLNS vs GMVMF Comparison
Open Charts GLNS vs GMVMFBanner chart's image
Golden Star Resource
Price$1.05
Change+$0.30 (+40.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.42M
GMV Minerals
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31.08K
Capitalization19.53M
GLNS vs GMVMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLNS vs. GMVMF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNS is a Hold and GMVMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (GLNS: $1.05 vs. GMVMF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: GLNS and GMVMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLNS: 73% vs. GMVMF: 31%
Market capitalization -- GLNS: $7.42M vs. GMVMF: $19.53M
GLNS [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.42M. GMVMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $19.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMVMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMVMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GLNS and GMVMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLNS’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMVMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLNS’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GMVMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMVMF is a better buy in the short-term than GLNS.

Price Growth

GLNS (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMVMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6005.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.48% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMVMF($19.5M) has a higher market cap than GLNS($7.42M). GMVMF YTD gains are higher at: 212.500 vs. GLNS (-8.696). GLNS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -64.25K vs. GMVMF (-610.17K). GMVMF has more cash in the bank: 31.9K vs. GLNS (5). GLNS (0) and GMVMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GLNSGMVMFGLNS / GMVMF
Capitalization7.42M19.5M38%
EBITDA-64.25K-610.17K11%
Gain YTD-8.696212.500-4%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash531.9K0%
Total Debt704KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLNS vs GMVMF: Fundamental Ratings
GLNS
GMVMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3770
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7595
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLNS's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as GMVMF (46). This means that GLNS’s stock grew similarly to GMVMF’s over the last 12 months.

GLNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as GMVMF (95). This means that GLNS’s stock grew similarly to GMVMF’s over the last 12 months.

GMVMF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNS (100). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew similarly to GLNS’s over the last 12 months.

GMVMF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNS (39). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew similarly to GLNS’s over the last 12 months.

GMVMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNS (100). This means that GMVMF’s stock grew similarly to GLNS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLNSGMVMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMVMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVX159.181.76
+1.12%
Chevron Corp
IDA128.430.64
+0.50%
IDACORP
NVCR12.84-0.16
-1.23%
NovoCure Limited
IPWR5.42-0.15
-2.69%
Ideal Power
GDC5.67-0.17
-2.91%
GD Culture Group Limited

GLNS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLNS and KSTBF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLNS and KSTBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNS
1D Price
Change %
GLNS100%
N/A
KSTBF - GLNS
29%
Poorly correlated
-15.38%
VGZ - GLNS
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
SNGCF - GLNS
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.47%
RGLD - GLNS
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
GMVMF - GLNS
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
More

GMVMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMVMF and MAIFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMVMF and MAIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMVMF
1D Price
Change %
GMVMF100%
+2.33%
MAIFF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+16.11%
NESRF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
IEGCF - GMVMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.83%
DTARF - GMVMF
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.84%
GLNS - GMVMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More