Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNNX vs SFCWX
GLNNX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNNX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R6
Price$25.43
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.94M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.68
Change-$0.18 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
GLNNX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNNX vs. SFCWX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNNX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. GLNNX (71.9M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNNX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNNX (0.63). GLNNX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNNX (13 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNNX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.67 vs. GLNNX (9.05). GLNNX (17.57) and SFCWX (17.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNNX | SFCWX | GLNNX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.65 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.65 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.048 | 9.923 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | 10.67 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.08 | 22.71 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.57 | 17.32 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement