Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNNX vs SFCWX
GLNNX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNNX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R6
Price$24.91
Change+$0.16 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.67M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$78.39
Change+$0.55 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
GLNNX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNNX vs. SFCWX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNNX is a Buy and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. GLNNX (70.7M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNNX: SFCWX (0.88) vs GLNNX (0.63). GLNNX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNNX (13 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNNX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. GLNNX (2.42). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 4.29 vs. GLNNX (3.68).
| GLNNX | SFCWX | GLNNX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.65 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.65 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.253 | 13.366 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.7M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.88 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.42 | 7.00 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.15 | 31.42 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.68 | 4.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers