Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNNX vs SFCWX
GLNNX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNNX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R6
Price$25.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.42M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.91
Change+$0.44 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
GLNNX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNNX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNNX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. GLNNX (76.4M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNNX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNNX (0.62). GLNNX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNNX (13 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNNX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.93 vs. SFCWX (10.80). GLNNX return over 5 years is better than : 27.66 vs. SFCWX (23.80).
| GLNNX | SFCWX | GLNNX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.65 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.65 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.786 | 8.805 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.4M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.94 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.93 | 10.80 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.93 | 36.16 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.66 | 23.80 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement