Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNNX vs RSLBX
GLNNX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNNX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery R6
Price$24.76
Change-$0.05 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$62.80
Change-$0.13 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.1B
GLNNX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNNX vs. RSLBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNNX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 81.1B vs. GLNNX (69.9M). GLNNX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: GLNNX (0.62) vs RSLBX (0.06). GLNNX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNNX (13 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). RSLBX (1.75) is less costly to investors than GLNNX (1.46). GLNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). GLNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLBX: GLNNX (0) vs RSLBX (250). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. GLNNX (3.49). GLNNX return over 5 years is better than : 9.03 vs. RSLBX (2.75).
| GLNNX | RSLBX | GLNNX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.75 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.75 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.122 | 10.182 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.9M | 81.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.06 | 1,102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.49 | 5.63 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.69 | 37.92 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.03 | 2.75 | 328% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.94 | 45.45 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement