Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNNX vs RSEBX
GLNNX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNNX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R6
Price$25.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.75
Change+$0.27 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.43B
GLNNX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNNX vs. RSEBX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNNX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.4B vs. GLNNX (71.2M). GLNNX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNNX (0.62) vs RSEBX (0.23). GLNNX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNNX (13 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNNX (1.46) and RSEBX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . GLNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNNX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. GLNNX (4.36). GLNNX return over 5 years is better than : 17.76 vs. RSEBX (13.62).
| GLNNX | RSEBX | GLNNX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.45 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.45 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.306 | 10.373 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 80.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.23 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.36 | 5.34 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.49 | 43.63 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.76 | 13.62 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.35 | 63.39 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement