Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNMX vs SFCWX
GLNMX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNMX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R4
Price$25.29
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.94M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.68
Change-$0.18 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.12B
GLNMX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNMX vs. SFCWX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNMX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.1B vs. GLNMX (71.9M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNMX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNMX (0.57). GLNMX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNMX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNMX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNMX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.90 vs. GLNMX (10.19). SFCWX (17.60) and GLNMX (17.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNMX | SFCWX | GLNMX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.65 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.101 | 10.185 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9M | 81.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.94 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.19 | 12.90 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.70 | 22.81 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.16 | 17.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.56 | N/A | - |