Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNMX vs SCWFX
GLNMX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNMX vs SCWFX
MFS Global New Discovery R4
Price$25.20
Change+$0.23 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.77M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$75.47
Change+$1.46 (+1.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNMX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNMX vs. SCWFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNMX is a StrongBuy and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNMX (68.8M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNMX: SCWFX (0.64) vs GLNMX (0.55). GLNMX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNMX (14 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GLNMX (1.51) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GLNMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). GLNMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GLNMX (0) vs SCWFX (250). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.16 vs. GLNMX (8.59). GLNMX return over 5 years is better than : 3.95 vs. SCWFX (-7.76).
| GLNMX | SCWFX | GLNMX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.07 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.07 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.521 | 4.761 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.64 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | 13.16 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.37 | 24.14 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.95 | -7.76 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.71 | 102.65 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement