Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNMX vs RSEBX
GLNMX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNMX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R4
Price$25.20
Change+$0.23 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.77M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.91
Change+$1.51 (+2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNMX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNMX vs. RSEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNMX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNMX (68.8M). GLNMX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNMX (0.55) vs RSEBX (0.34). GLNMX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNMX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNMX (1.51) and RSEBX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . GLNMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSEBX (41.00). GLNMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNMX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.65 vs. GLNMX (8.59). GLNMX return over 5 years is better than : 3.95 vs. RSEBX (-9.71).
| GLNMX | RSEBX | GLNMX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.45 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.521 | 4.733 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.34 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | 12.65 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.37 | 22.63 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.95 | -9.71 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.71 | 94.72 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement