Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SFCWX
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.46
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.43M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$78.16
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNLX (73.4M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SFCWX (1.04) vs GLNLX (0.39). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNLX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.13 vs. GLNLX (11.67). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 3.31 vs. SFCWX (-2.99).
| GLNLX | SFCWX | GLNLX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.485 | 4.227 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.4M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.04 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.67 | 16.13 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.77 | 31.19 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.31 | -2.99 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers