Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SFCWX
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.52M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$77.32
Change+$0.17 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.6B
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SFCWX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a StrongBuy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. GLNLX (70.5M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SFCWX (0.90) vs GLNLX (0.36). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNLX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. GLNLX (4.06). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 9.26 vs. GLNLX (6.02).
| GLNLX | SFCWX | GLNLX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.804 | 12.305 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.5M | 81.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | 7.88 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.07 | 32.00 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.02 | 9.26 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement