Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SFCWX
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.82M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.58
Change+$0.38 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. GLNLX (76.8M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNLX (0.35). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNLX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. SFCWX (10.24). SFCWX (21.81) and GLNLX (21.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNLX | SFCWX | GLNLX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.332 | 9.778 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.8M | 79.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.94 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.22 | 10.24 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.67 | 33.82 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.35 | 21.81 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement