Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SFCWX
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.03
Change+$0.16 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.67M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$78.39
Change+$0.55 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
GLNLX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SFCWX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. GLNLX (70.7M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SFCWX (0.88) vs GLNLX (0.36). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNLX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. GLNLX (2.05). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 4.29 vs. GLNLX (1.66).
| GLNLX | SFCWX | GLNLX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.946 | 13.366 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.7M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.88 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 7.00 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.87 | 31.42 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.66 | 4.29 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement