Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs SCWFX
GLNLX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SCWFX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$23.66
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.74M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$73.06
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
GLNLX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SCWFX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a StrongBuy and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. GLNLX (70.7M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SCWFX (0.52) vs GLNLX (0.36). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNLX (14 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GLNLX (0) vs SCWFX (250). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.66 vs. GLNLX (5.63). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.04 vs. SCWFX (-5.89).
| GLNLX | SCWFX | GLNLX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.817 | 10.253 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.7M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.52 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 8.66 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.86 | 34.73 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.04 | -5.89 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.58 | 69.39 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement