Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs RSLAX
GLNLX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs RSLAX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.38
Change+$0.12 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
Price$62.54
Change+$0.23 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
GLNLX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. RSLAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. GLNLX (71.2M). GLNLX pays higher dividends than RSLAX: GLNLX (0.35) vs RSLAX (0.11). GLNLX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: GLNLX (14 years) vs RSLAX (23 years). GLNLX (1.81) and RSLAX (1.74) have similar cost to investors . GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLAX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSLAX: GLNLX (0) vs RSLAX (250). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.02 vs. GLNLX (4.01). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.50 vs. RSLAX (10.42).
| GLNLX | RSLAX | GLNLX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.74 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.74 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.068 | 10.111 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 80.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.11 | 331% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.01 | 5.02 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.92 | 42.37 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.50 | 10.42 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.17 | 53.12 | 142% |