Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs RSEBX
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.52M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.51
Change+$0.16 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.6B
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. RSEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.6B vs. GLNLX (70.5M). GLNLX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNLX (0.36) vs RSEBX (0.22). GLNLX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNLX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNLX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. GLNLX (4.06). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 6.02 vs. RSEBX (4.76).
| GLNLX | RSEBX | GLNLX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.45 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.804 | 11.542 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.5M | 81.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.22 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.06 | 7.02 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.07 | 29.26 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.02 | 4.76 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.73 | 58.21 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement