Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs RSEBX
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$23.61
Change-$0.35 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$67.10
Change-$1.07 (-1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.47B
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GLNLX (74.1M). GLNLX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNLX (0.36) vs RSEBX (0.21). GLNLX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNLX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNLX (0) vs RSEBX (250). GLNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.64 vs. RSEBX (4.35). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 25.27 vs. RSEBX (19.11).
| GLNLX | RSEBX | GLNLX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.45 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.591 | 3.220 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.21 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 4.35 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.60 | 28.47 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.27 | 19.11 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.93 | 32.55 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement