Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs RSEBX
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.51
Change+$0.10 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.42M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$70.45
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. GLNLX (76.4M). GLNLX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNLX (0.35) vs RSEBX (0.23). GLNLX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNLX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNLX (0) vs RSEBX (250). GLNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. RSEBX (9.90). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 25.22 vs. RSEBX (18.70).
| GLNLX | RSEBX | GLNLX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.45 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.655 | 8.373 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.4M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.23 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 9.90 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.54 | 33.34 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.22 | 18.70 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.58 | 41.22 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement