Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNLX vs RSEBX
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.06
Change+$0.17 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$72.57
Change+$0.77 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
GLNLX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. RSEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. GLNLX (69.9M). GLNLX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNLX (0.35) vs RSEBX (0.23). GLNLX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNLX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNLX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. GLNLX (3.75). GLNLX (8.12) and RSEBX (8.06) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNLX | RSEBX | GLNLX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.45 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.623 | 11.635 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.9M | 80.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.23 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.75 | 7.11 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.94 | 42.30 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.12 | 8.06 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.33 | 55.97 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers