GLNLF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
106.93M
USREF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.02 (-3.45%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
18.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLNLF vs USREF

Header iconGLNLF vs USREF Comparison
Open Charts GLNLF vs USREFBanner chart's image
GALAN LITHIUM
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$19.35K
Capitalization106.93M
TACTICAL RES
Price$0.56
Change-$0.02 (-3.45%)
Volume$1.97K
Capitalization18.62M
GLNLF vs USREF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLNLF vs. USREF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLF is a Hold and USREF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GLNLF: $0.12 vs. USREF: $0.56)
Brand notoriety: GLNLF and USREF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLNLF: 26% vs. USREF: 29%
Market capitalization -- GLNLF: $106.93M vs. USREF: $18.62M
GLNLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $106.93M. USREF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLNLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSREF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLNLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USREF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLNLF is a better buy in the long-term than USREF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLNLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USREF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLNLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USREF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USREF is a better buy in the short-term than GLNLF.

Price Growth

GLNLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.09% price change this week, while USREF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLNLF($107M) has a higher market cap than USREF($18.6M). USREF YTD gains are higher at: 2151.000 vs. GLNLF (61.943). USREF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -7.6M vs. GLNLF (-9.55M).
GLNLFUSREFGLNLF / USREF
Capitalization107M18.6M575%
EBITDA-9.55M-7.6M126%
Gain YTD61.9432151.0003%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A268K-
Total DebtN/A643K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLNLFUSREF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
46%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANORX20.350.11
+0.54%
American Century Small Cap Growth R
TISWX49.19N/A
N/A
Nuveen S&P 500 Index W
CFIPX28.00-0.03
-0.11%
Franklin Global Equity A
TOECX40.94-0.05
-0.12%
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth C
NELIX65.17-0.21
-0.32%
Nuveen Equity Long/Short I

GLNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLNLF and MLGCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLNLF and MLGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNLF
1D Price
Change %
GLNLF100%
+9.09%
MLGCF - GLNLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPX - GLNLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
LBNKF - GLNLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
IBATF - GLNLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-8.91%
ELBM - GLNLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More

USREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USREF and HUSIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USREF and HUSIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USREF
1D Price
Change %
USREF100%
N/A
HUSIF - USREF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
GLNLF - USREF
6%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
LLLAF - USREF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - USREF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
GTMLF - USREF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More