GLNLF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
106.93M
MLGCF
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLNLF vs MLGCF

Header iconGLNLF vs MLGCF Comparison
Open Charts GLNLF vs MLGCFBanner chart's image
GALAN LITHIUM
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$19.35K
Capitalization106.93M
M3 Metals
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+6.67%)
Volume$17K
Capitalization1.6M
GLNLF vs MLGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLNLF vs. MLGCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLF is a Hold and MLGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GLNLF: $0.12 vs. MLGCF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: GLNLF and MLGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLNLF: 26% vs. MLGCF: 120%
Market capitalization -- GLNLF: $106.93M vs. MLGCF: $1.6M
GLNLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $106.93M. MLGCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLNLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLNLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GLNLF and MLGCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLNLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLNLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLGCF is a better buy in the short-term than GLNLF.

Price Growth

GLNLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.09% price change this week, while MLGCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLNLF($107M) has a higher market cap than MLGCF($1.6M). GLNLF YTD gains are higher at: 61.943 vs. MLGCF (7.266). MLGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -548.15K vs. GLNLF (-9.55M).
GLNLFMLGCFGLNLF / MLGCF
Capitalization107M1.6M6,692%
EBITDA-9.55M-548.15K1,742%
Gain YTD61.9437.266852%
P/E RatioN/A15.82-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A846K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLGCF: Fundamental Ratings
MLGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLNLFMLGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
46%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMPP3.530.07
+2.02%
Imperial Petroleum
SNDL2.480.04
+1.64%
SNDL
PKG220.253.53
+1.63%
Packaging Corp
SEZL85.850.96
+1.13%
Sezzle Inc
STAK0.82N/A
+0.37%
Stak Inc

GLNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLNLF and MLGCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLNLF and MLGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNLF
1D Price
Change %
GLNLF100%
+9.09%
MLGCF - GLNLF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPX - GLNLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
LBNKF - GLNLF
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
IBATF - GLNLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-8.91%
ELBM - GLNLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
More

MLGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLGCF has been loosely correlated with PPZRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLGCF jumps, then PPZRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGCF
1D Price
Change %
MLGCF100%
N/A
PPZRF - MLGCF
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAXPF - MLGCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOEYF - MLGCF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLNLF - MLGCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+9.09%
ULTHF - MLGCF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.36%
More