GLNLF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
246.75M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MALRY
Price
$37.82
Change
+$0.44 (+1.18%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.41B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLNLF vs MALRY

Header iconGLNLF vs MALRY Comparison
Open Charts GLNLF vs MALRYBanner chart's image
GALAN LITHIUM
Price$0.22
Change+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Volume$35K
Capitalization246.75M
Mineral Resources
Price$37.82
Change+$0.44 (+1.18%)
Volume$4.06K
Capitalization7.41B
GLNLF vs MALRY Comparison Chart in %
GLNLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MALRY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLNLF vs. MALRY commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLF is a Buy and MALRY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (GLNLF: $0.22 vs. MALRY: $37.82)
Brand notoriety: GLNLF and MALRY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLNLF: 50% vs. MALRY: 154%
Market capitalization -- GLNLF: $246.75M vs. MALRY: $7.41B
GLNLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $246.75M. MALRY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLNLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMALRY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLNLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MALRY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MALRY is a better buy in the long-term than GLNLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLNLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MALRY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLNLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MALRY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLNLF is a better buy in the short-term than MALRY.

Price Growth

GLNLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +29.41% price change this week, while MALRY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +8.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+8.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MALRY($7.41B) has a higher market cap than GLNLF($247M). GLNLF YTD gains are higher at: 196.896 vs. MALRY (72.852).
GLNLFMALRYGLNLF / MALRY
Capitalization247M7.41B3%
EBITDA-9.55MN/A-
Gain YTD196.89672.852270%
P/E RatioN/A32.26-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MALRY: Fundamental Ratings
MALRY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLNLFMALRY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLNLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MALRY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RREMX17.030.06
+0.35%
RBC Emerging Markets Equity R6
SCPIX54.780.18
+0.33%
DWS S&P 500 Index S
IEMFX39.990.09
+0.23%
T. Rowe Price Instl Emerging Mkts Eq
TGVYX55.340.08
+0.14%
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth Y
CNPIX71.22N/A
N/A
Consumer Staples UltraSector ProFund Inv

GLNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLNLF and LITOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLNLF and LITOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNLF
1D Price
Change %
GLNLF100%
+4.76%
LITOF - GLNLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
MALRY - GLNLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
TLOFF - GLNLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.81%
IPX - GLNLF
18%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
YORKF - GLNLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+53.37%
More

MALRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MALRY has been loosely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MALRY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MALRY
1D Price
Change %
MALRY100%
+1.18%
BHP - MALRY
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
RIO - MALRY
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
FSUGY - MALRY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
VALE - MALRY
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
PMETF - MALRY
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
More