Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNKX vs RSEBX
GLNKX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNKX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery R2
Price$23.05
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.1B
GLNKX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNKX vs. RSEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNKX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.1B vs. GLNKX (69.9M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: RSEBX (0.23) vs GLNKX (0.13). GLNKX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNKX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNKX (2.06) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNKX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.94 vs. GLNKX (2.87). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 5.76 vs. GLNKX (5.31).
| GLNKX | RSEBX | GLNKX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.45 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.45 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.610 | 10.450 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.9M | 81.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.23 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.87 | 5.94 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.10 | 39.16 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.31 | 5.76 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.22 | 55.08 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement