Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNIX vs SFCWX
GLNIX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNIX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$24.59
Change-$0.05 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.17M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$77.84
Change-$0.21 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.25B
GLNIX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNIX vs. SFCWX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNIX is a Buy and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 83.3B vs. GLNIX (70.2M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNIX: SFCWX (0.88) vs GLNIX (0.55). GLNIX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNIX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNIX (0) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. GLNIX (2.30). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 4.29 vs. GLNIX (3.16).
| GLNIX | SFCWX | GLNIX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.65 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 0.65 | 240% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.165 | 13.366 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.2M | 83.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.88 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | 7.00 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.78 | 31.42 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.16 | 4.29 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement