Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNIX vs SCWFX
GLNIX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNIX vs SCWFX
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$24.33
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.64M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$73.11
Change+$0.10 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
GLNIX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNIX vs. SCWFX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNIX is a StrongBuy and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. GLNIX (70.6M). GLNIX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GLNIX (0.55) vs SCWFX (0.52). GLNIX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNIX (14 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GLNIX (0) vs SCWFX (250). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. GLNIX (5.78). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 1.14 vs. SCWFX (-5.83).
| GLNIX | SCWFX | GLNIX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.07 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.07 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.804 | 10.328 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.6M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.52 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 9.05 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 34.41 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.14 | -5.83 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.39 | 70.60 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement