Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNIX vs RSEBX
GLNIX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNIX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$25.18
Change+$0.22 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.83M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.91
Change+$1.51 (+2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNIX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNIX vs. RSEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNIX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNIX (69.8M). GLNIX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNIX (0.59) vs RSEBX (0.34). GLNIX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNIX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNIX (1.51) and RSEBX (1.45) have similar cost to investors . GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSEBX (41.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSEBX: GLNIX (0) vs RSEBX (250). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.65 vs. GLNIX (8.64). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.90 vs. RSEBX (-9.71).
| GLNIX | RSEBX | GLNIX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.45 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.45 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.525 | 4.733 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.34 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.64 | 12.65 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.40 | 22.63 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.90 | -9.71 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.73 | 94.72 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement