GLNCY
Price
$8.97
Change
+$0.11 (+1.24%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
52.93B
31 days until earnings call
LTMCF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
69.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLNCY vs LTMCF

Header iconGLNCY vs LTMCF Comparison
Open Charts GLNCY vs LTMCFBanner chart's image
Glencore
Price$8.97
Change+$0.11 (+1.24%)
Volume$549.92K
Capitalization52.93B
Lithium Chile
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.02K
Capitalization69.71M
GLNCY vs LTMCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLNCY vs. LTMCF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCY is a Buy and LTMCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GLNCY: $8.97 vs. LTMCF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: GLNCY and LTMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLNCY: 89% vs. LTMCF: 58%
Market capitalization -- GLNCY: $52.93B vs. LTMCF: $69.71M
GLNCY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $52.93B. LTMCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $69.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLNCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLTMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLNCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LTMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLNCY is a better buy in the long-term than LTMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLNCY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LTMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLNCY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LTMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLNCY is a better buy in the short-term than LTMCF.

Price Growth

GLNCY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.43% price change this week, while LTMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLNCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLNCY($52.9B) has a higher market cap than LTMCF($69.7M). LTMCF has higher P/E ratio than GLNCY: LTMCF (46.86) vs GLNCY (14.59). GLNCY YTD gains are higher at: 5.658 vs. LTMCF (-37.982). GLNCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.13B vs. LTMCF (-2.93M). GLNCY has more cash in the bank: 2.68B vs. LTMCF (448K). GLNCY has higher revenues than LTMCF: GLNCY (231B) vs LTMCF (0).
GLNCYLTMCFGLNCY / LTMCF
Capitalization52.9B69.7M75,897%
EBITDA8.13B-2.93M-277,875%
Gain YTD5.658-37.982-15%
P/E Ratio14.5946.8631%
Revenue231B0-
Total Cash2.68B448K598,214%
Total Debt41.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLNCY vs LTMCF: Fundamental Ratings
GLNCY
LTMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5386
SMR RATING
1..100
10088
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4691
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LTMCF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (94). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTMCF (86). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (100). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTMCF (91). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLNCY (58). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLNCYLTMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIII27.350.65
+2.43%
G-III Apparel Group Ltd
BGFV1.440.02
+1.41%
Big 5 Sporting Goods Corp
MFG6.850.07
+1.03%
Mizuho Financial Group
CHMG53.400.08
+0.16%
Chemung Financial Corp
FOUR79.12-0.66
-0.83%
Shift4 Payments

GLNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLNCY has been closely correlated with GLCNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLNCY jumps, then GLCNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNCY
1D Price
Change %
GLNCY100%
+1.24%
GLCNF - GLNCY
89%
Closely correlated
+2.71%
RIO - GLNCY
75%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
BHP - GLNCY
74%
Closely correlated
-1.71%
BDNNY - GLNCY
72%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
IVPAF - GLNCY
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.63%
More

LTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTMCF and PILBF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTMCF and PILBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTMCF
1D Price
Change %
LTMCF100%
-0.24%
PILBF - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
PMETF - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
GLCNF - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
GLNCY - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
LYSCF - LTMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
More