GLNCY
Price
$7.70
Change
+$0.05 (+0.65%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
45.71B
51 days until earnings call
GSM
Price
$4.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
798.76M
71 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLNCY vs GSM

Header iconGLNCY vs GSM Comparison
Open Charts GLNCY vs GSMBanner chart's image
Glencore
Price$7.70
Change+$0.05 (+0.65%)
Volume$1.44M
Capitalization45.71B
Ferroglobe
Price$4.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization798.76M
GLNCY vs GSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLNCY vs. GSM commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCY is a Hold and GSM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GLNCY: $7.70 vs. GSM: $4.28)
Brand notoriety: GLNCY and GSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLNCY: 225% vs. GSM: 48%
Market capitalization -- GLNCY: $45.71B vs. GSM: $798.76M
GLNCY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $45.71B. GSM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $798.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLNCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLNCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSM is a better buy in the long-term than GLNCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLNCY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSM’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLNCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GSM’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSM is a better buy in the short-term than GLNCY.

Price Growth

GLNCY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.04% price change this week, while GSM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLNCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

GSM is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.43% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLNCY($45.7B) has a higher market cap than GSM($799M). GLNCY has higher P/E ratio than GSM: GLNCY (14.59) vs GSM (6.03). GSM YTD gains are higher at: 13.421 vs. GLNCY (-9.301). GLNCY has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. GSM (148M). GSM has less debt than GLNCY: GSM (220M) vs GLNCY (38.1B).
GLNCYGSMGLNCY / GSM
Capitalization45.7B799M5,720%
EBITDAN/A262M-
Gain YTD-9.30113.421-69%
P/E Ratio14.596.03242%
RevenueN/A1.4B-
Total Cash1.42B148M956%
Total Debt38.1B220M17,318%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLNCY vs GSM: Fundamental Ratings
GLNCY
GSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5961
SMR RATING
1..100
10047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6396
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSM's Valuation (16) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLNCY (92) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew significantly faster than GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as GSM (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GLNCY’s stock grew similarly to GSM’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's SMR Rating (47) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLNCY (100) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as GLNCY (60) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSM (96) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GLNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLNCYGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STT112.95-1.11
-0.97%
State Street Corp
MTSR35.87-0.42
-1.16%
Metsera Inc
TVGN0.87-0.01
-1.47%
Tevogen Bio Holdings
AMS2.51-0.04
-1.57%
American Shared Hospital Services
KOS1.64-0.08
-4.65%
Kosmos Energy Ltd

GLNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLNCY has been closely correlated with GLCNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLNCY jumps, then GLCNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNCY
1D Price
Change %
GLNCY100%
+0.65%
GLCNF - GLNCY
89%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
RIO - GLNCY
75%
Closely correlated
+2.42%
BHP - GLNCY
74%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
BDNNY - GLNCY
72%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
IVPAF - GLNCY
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More

GSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSM has been loosely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSM jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSM
1D Price
Change %
GSM100%
+2.39%
TECK - GSM
41%
Loosely correlated
+4.70%
MTRN - GSM
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
BHP - GSM
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
FSUGY - GSM
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
GLNCY - GSM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More