Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs SMCWX
GLNCX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs SMCWX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.30
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.02M
American Funds SMALLCAP World A
Price$74.74
Change+$0.30 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.74B
GLNCX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. SMCWX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.7B vs. GLNCX (70M). SMCWX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: SMCWX (0.57) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: GLNCX (14 years) vs SMCWX (35 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.04). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SMCWX (32.00). SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: SMCWX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.19 vs. GLNCX (2.21). SMCWX return over 5 years is better than : 8.61 vs. GLNCX (2.16).
| GLNCX | SMCWX | GLNCX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.04 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.04 | 246% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.359 | 10.944 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70M | 80.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | 6.19 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.39 | 46.74 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.16 | 8.61 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.64 | 62.56 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement