Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs SFCWX
GLNCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.30
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.02M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$76.61
Change+$0.31 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.74B
GLNCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. SFCWX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 80.7B vs. GLNCX (70M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: SFCWX (0.90) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNCX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNCX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. GLNCX (2.21). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.52 vs. GLNCX (2.16).
| GLNCX | SFCWX | GLNCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.65 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.359 | 11.274 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70M | 80.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | 6.60 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.39 | 47.94 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.16 | 10.52 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement